I recently read that the analytics on Stanky were bad… if that’s true, at least at this point the analytics are useless! Ok maybe not completely, but Stanky IS a hockey stud. Ain’t no doubt about it. Fact.
you shouldn't read much into analytics on any player after just 4 games, it's not enough of a sample size. But there is a reality that through the first 4 games Stankoven has been on the ice for more chances against than the Stars have generated.
I appreciate this article. The issue has been both interesting and painful to watch from afar. I wonder, do the Hurricanes have trouble competing in the free agency market since it's well known that the owner doesn't like to spend on off ice activities?
I recently read that the analytics on Stanky were bad… if that’s true, at least at this point the analytics are useless! Ok maybe not completely, but Stanky IS a hockey stud. Ain’t no doubt about it. Fact.
Question is, what else are they wrong about?
you shouldn't read much into analytics on any player after just 4 games, it's not enough of a sample size. But there is a reality that through the first 4 games Stankoven has been on the ice for more chances against than the Stars have generated.
I appreciate this article. The issue has been both interesting and painful to watch from afar. I wonder, do the Hurricanes have trouble competing in the free agency market since it's well known that the owner doesn't like to spend on off ice activities?